Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Exterior of the European Parliament, Strasbourg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Exterior of the European Parliament, Strasbourg

The building was completed in 1999 by Architecture-Studio. There is no freedom of panorama in France, permission from the architectural firm is required.

A1Cafel (talk) 09:55, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ə XPLICIT 00:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Exterior of the European Parliament, Strasbourg

The building was completed in 1999 by Architecture-Studio. Unfortunately, there is no freedom of panorama in France, permission from the architectural firm is required.

A1Cafel (talk) 04:33, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All photos concerning the European Parliament in Strasbourg must be restored

Their deletion is an attack on European Institutions.

You are not a European citizen, you are not a specialist in European law (even less in French law since you do not speak French). On Wiki you are not enforcing a right that you do not know, but you are pursuing obscure reasons.

1 Le Parlement Européen de Strasbourg bien que situé sur le territoire français n'appartient pas à la France. Il appartient à la Communauté Européenne comme son nom l'indique. Pour tout ce qui concerne le parlement européen il faut vous référer aux lois européennes. The European Parliament in Strasbourg, although located on French territory, does not belong to France. It belongs to the European Community as its name suggests. For everything concerning the European Parliament, you must refer to European laws.

2 Si vous persistez à vouloir vous référer à la loi française sur la Propriété des droits d'auteurs, sachez que cette loi (comme la plupart des lois françaises est extrêmement compliquée à comprendre. - Un, il y a le Texte. - Deux, il y a l'Esprit. - Trois, il y a l'Usage. - Quatre, les Contrats de Droits privés qui tout en faisant dérogation à la loi générale sont considérés comme légaux. - Cinq, les multiples exceptions référencées ou pas. - Six, SURTOUT il y a la JURISPRUDENCE qui dit comment la loi doit s'appliquer. Avez-vous consulté la jurisprudence en ce qui concerne le parlement européen de Strasbourg ?

3 In all the media of all countries, all continents of the world (France..., Europ, Africa, América, Asia, Oceania) you can see thousands and thousands photos or films of European Parliament in Strasbourg. Google more than 7 000. Most often seen from the outside. EXCEPT ON WIKI !!! WHY ??? HAS THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT EVER FILED A COMPLAINT FOR THE DISTRIBUTION OF PHOTOS ON THE NET? Wiki would have become the temple of non-information, of obscurantism ! I can't believe it ! It's a crasy story ! Pinch me, I'm having a nightmare !!

4 WAKE UP A1Cafel You are not the best lawyer in the world. Do you known the contract between the architect and the European Community ? Simple common sense do not make you think that : "The European Community can not pay for the construction of a parliament wich should remain INVISIBLE ? (except with the explicit authorization of the architect for each picture !)" Before censoring the work of others, it seems to me that it would be wise, honest to take all the information possible.

5 This is not a simple error of assessement but an unfounded, authoritarian decision. Your immoderate taste for censorship damages Wiki ! If you really love Wiki, I suggest you quit your supervisor activity. Or, at minimum, strongly moderate yourself.

Have a good day. Alain Delorme -- Céléda (talk) 11:27, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Céléda, I suggest you make an appeal at COM:Undeletion requests. But what does the European law in fact say about images of the European Parliament? Arguing that many of them are on Google is not going to win the day for you. You should cite applicable laws if you can. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:27, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Ikan Kekek

Thank you for your advice. I'm going to try. But computers and me...!

Have a good day.

--Céléda (talk) 07:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Celeda, a couple of years ago there was a motion in the EP to apply Freedom of Panorama throughout the EU. Of course there was a counter-motion to completely abolish Freedom of Panorama throughout the EU. In the end nothing was changed. During that debate I had a lengthy discussion in French with a French member of the EP. He explained that France just is not willing to let big Internet platforms gain money with royalty-free photos of French objects. So I assume WC will have to delete these pictures. Have a nice day -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 16:22, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:53, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]